Discussion:
Vote NO on C and D
(too old to reply)
c***@yahoo.com
2005-10-31 14:19:10 UTC
Permalink
There are only two ways a society can get things done: either through
voluntary actions, or through coercion. Whenever possible, a civil
society will try to get things done through voluntary actions.

Referendums C and D on the ballot this November ask voters how they
want to get some things done relating to Transportation, Education,
Health Care, and Public employee retirement plans.

Many of the items to be funded by by C and D can be better
accomplished in the private/voluntary sector -- through charities
like the American Red Cross and the Salvation Army, and through
privately-funded scholarships and vouchers.

A "Yes" vote on C and D is a vote in favor of using coercion -- though
the tax system to get these things done. A "No" vote on C and D is
a vote in favor of using voluntary action to get these things done.

Please join libertarians in voting in favor of a civil society,
by voting "No" on referendums C and D. It's not nice
to coerce your fellow peaceful Coloradoans.

Chuck Wright
http://www.lpcolorado.org/
I Ms. Liberty
2005-11-01 05:59:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by c***@yahoo.com
There are only two ways a society can get things done: either
through voluntary actions, or through coercion. Whenever
possible, a civil society will try to get things done through
voluntary actions.
Referendums C and D on the ballot this November ask voters how
they want to get some things done relating to Transportation,
Education, Health Care, and Public employee retirement plans.
Many of the items to be funded by by C and D can be better
accomplished in the private/voluntary sector -- through
charities like the American Red Cross and the Salvation Army,
and through privately-funded scholarships and vouchers.
A "Yes" vote on C and D is a vote in favor of using coercion
-- though the tax system to get these things done. A "No"
vote on C and D is a vote in favor of using voluntary action
to get these things done.
Please join libertarians in voting in favor of a civil
society, by voting "No" on referendums C and D. It's not nice
to coerce your fellow peaceful Coloradoans.
Chuck Wright
http://www.lpcolorado.org/
Thank you Chuck, I already mailed in my NO vote on these.
--
Ms Liberty
United States of America

Lenin coined the term "useful idiots" for the morons who could be
used to wage a campaign for socialism, and they're all out in
force, in the form of liberals on usenet.
Sam Bam
2005-11-02 17:42:21 UTC
Permalink
A yes on C and a NO on D????

You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????

Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!

You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!

Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!

FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Phil Earnhardt
2005-11-02 18:54:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
The first words of question C on the ballot were "Without raising
taxes." That is incorrect; Amendment C does a re-set on the TABOR
limits after the 5-year period; taxes are indeed permantntly raised.

Caldara has said that C will be challenged:

“I will guarantee you that if by some miracle this thing passes, it
won’t be long before it’s tangled up in court,” predicted Independence
Institute President Jon Caldara, one of the leading opponents of
Referendum C and Referendum D, its companion bonding proposal.
Post by Sam Bam
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
I don't know how many voters understood they were indeed voting on a
tax increase when they voted for C. I don't understand why the state
allowed them to phrase the ballot question that way.
Post by Sam Bam
[Epithet snipped.]
Well, it looked like a grim day here in 1992 when Amendment 2 passed.

--phil
Sam Bam
2005-11-02 20:59:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
The first words of question C on the ballot were "Without raising
taxes." That is incorrect; Amendment C does a re-set on the TABOR
limits after the 5-year period; taxes are indeed permantntly raised.
Correct!
Post by Phil Earnhardt
“I will guarantee you that if by some miracle this thing passes, it
won’t be long before it’s tangled up in court,” predicted Independence
Institute President Jon Caldara, one of the leading opponents of
Referendum C and Referendum D, its companion bonding proposal.
Between him and Bruce it will get reviewed.
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Post by Sam Bam
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
I don't know how many voters understood they were indeed voting on a
tax increase when they voted for C. I don't understand why the state
allowed them to phrase the ballot question that way.
Gee, it's not like the "state" could have any vested interest in
seeing tax revenues rise now is it?
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Post by Sam Bam
[Epithet snipped.]
Oh come on man, have some spine!
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Well, it looked like a grim day here in 1992 when Amendment 2 passed.
--phil
Damned right, and maybe that was the first whiff of the political
stupidity of the mommy-van mentality californicators who've infested
this place.

Screw each and every one of the lackadaisical bastards!
I Ms. Liberty
2005-11-02 22:55:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to
INCREASE public spending and then turned DOWN *privately
funded* road BOND issuance????
The first words of question C on the ballot were "Without
raising taxes." That is incorrect; Amendment C does a re-set
on the TABOR limits after the 5-year period; taxes are indeed
permantntly raised.
They want to increase debt without raising taxes? Ever heard of a
BALANCED BUDGET? Phhhttttt!
--
Ms Liberty
United States of America

Lenin coined the term "useful idiots" for the morons who could be
used to wage a campaign for socialism, and they're all out in
force, in the form of liberals on usenet.
Sam Bam
2005-11-02 23:15:52 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:55:46 -0600, "I Ms. Liberty"
Post by I Ms. Liberty
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to
INCREASE public spending and then turned DOWN *privately
funded* road BOND issuance????
The first words of question C on the ballot were "Without
raising taxes." That is incorrect; Amendment C does a re-set
on the TABOR limits after the 5-year period; taxes are indeed
permantntly raised.
They want to increase debt without raising taxes? Ever heard of a
BALANCED BUDGET? Phhhttttt!
http://www.members.aol.com/lwvco/COBALLOTISSUES2005.html

REFERENDUM C
STATE SPENDING
A referendum to amend the Colorado Revised
Statutes authorizing the state to retain and spend
all state revenues from existing taxes in excess
of the constitutional limitation Article X,
Section 20 beginning July 1, 2005 and ending
June 30, 2010. Requires the retained excess state
revenues to be used to pay for education, health
care, transportation, and retirement plans for
firefighters and police officers.

Major Provisions:
¥ Allows the state to keep and use all the tax
revenue it collects for the next five years.
¥ Funds public schools and colleges, roads,
health care, police and firefighter retirement
plans.
¥ Adjusts the budget base yearly for inflation,
and population growth.
¥ Allows for a temporary tax cut when
revenues exceed the existing TABOR limits
after the fifth year.
¥ Sets a new spending level for the state in
2011 and following years to an amount
equal to the highest revenue collected during
the first five years plus inflation and
population growth.

REFERENDUM D
STATE BORROWING
A referendum that amends Article 77 of title 24,
Colorado Revised Statutes to authorize the state
to incur debt for the purpose of providing
funding to address critical state needs.

Major Provisions:
¥ Depends on voter approval of Referendum C
for passage.
¥ Permits the state to borrow up to $2.072
billion with a maximum repayment of
$3.225 billion.
¥ Specifies that the fiscal notes shall be used
for transportation projects, K-12 and higher
education capital construction, and funding
of pensions for police and firefighters.
¥ States that for five years the bonds will be
repaid from revenues that Referendum C
allows the state to retain and spend.
¥ Allows an additional $100 million to be
added to the new state revenue limit to cover
bonding obligations for capital construction,
beginning in the budget year 2010-2011.


Why ANYONE would separate the 2 is ludicrous, you either go for it all
or vote both down.

Fucking idiot's paradise, we have been californicated into apathetic
stupidity.
Phil Earnhardt
2005-11-03 21:08:20 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:55:46 -0600, "I Ms. Liberty"
Post by I Ms. Liberty
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to
INCREASE public spending and then turned DOWN *privately
funded* road BOND issuance????
The first words of question C on the ballot were "Without
raising taxes." That is incorrect; Amendment C does a re-set
on the TABOR limits after the 5-year period; taxes are indeed
permantntly raised.
They want to increase debt without raising taxes? Ever heard of a
BALANCED BUDGET? Phhhttttt!
There were two parts to the deal with Question C.

One part was to allow the state to keep the TABOR refunds over a
5-year period.

A second part was to do an upward re-set on the TABOR levels
*themselves* after that 5 year period. It is a permanent tax increase.

This second part was only understood if you delved into the details of
the initiative. It was marketed as something to "get us over the
recession".

BTW: since Question D did not pass, there is no increase in our debt.

--phil
Sam Bam
2005-11-04 18:42:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:55:46 -0600, "I Ms. Liberty"
Post by I Ms. Liberty
Post by Phil Earnhardt
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to
INCREASE public spending and then turned DOWN *privately
funded* road BOND issuance????
The first words of question C on the ballot were "Without
raising taxes." That is incorrect; Amendment C does a re-set
on the TABOR limits after the 5-year period; taxes are indeed
permantntly raised.
They want to increase debt without raising taxes? Ever heard of a
BALANCED BUDGET? Phhhttttt!
There were two parts to the deal with Question C.
One part was to allow the state to keep the TABOR refunds over a
5-year period.
A second part was to do an upward re-set on the TABOR levels
*themselves* after that 5 year period. It is a permanent tax increase.
Just as the recession was a permanent revenue ratchet down!

Both sides wrote faulty amendments.

TABOR never set any kind of recession recovery mechanism.

And C never set any kind of recession recovery point.

Neither one was worth dog spit!
Post by Sam Bam
This second part was only understood if you delved into the details of
the initiative. It was marketed as something to "get us over the
recession".
BTW: since Question D did not pass, there is no increase in our debt.
No, road improvements will now have to come from a Governor gutsy
enough to FORCE spending from C on roads, or from an increase in the
gas tax or registration fees.
Chuck Wright
2005-11-02 22:55:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
Yes on C and no on D equals more taxes and more spending
but no additional debt.
Post by Sam Bam
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
Voting down both C and D would have been much better than only
voting down D, and voting down D is much better than passing
both C and D.

By the way, the D bonds were to be underwritten by private bond
companies, but they were to be repaid with tax dollars. The tax
dollars to repay the D bonds could have come from C if C generated
enough revenue to repay the D bonds.
Post by Sam Bam
Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!
Had D passed, the taxpayers would have had to eventually repay the
bonds plus interest. Essentially, D bonds + interest = future taxes.
Post by Sam Bam
You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!
Evidently you are still in preschool.
Post by Sam Bam
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Go wash your potty mouth out with soap.

Chuck Wright
http://www.lpcolorado.org/
Sam Bam
2005-11-02 23:13:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
Yes on C and no on D equals more taxes and more spending
but no additional debt.
True.

And DEBT is how you finance new road issues!

Now all we have is a REPAIR fund, not a new CONSTRUCTION mandate!
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
Voting down both C and D would have been much better than only
voting down D, and voting down D is much better than passing
both C and D.
By the way, the D bonds were to be underwritten by private bond
companies, but they were to be repaid with tax dollars. The tax
dollars to repay the D bonds could have come from C if C generated
enough revenue to repay the D bonds.
But only for the 1st 6 years!

C's provisions:

http://www.members.aol.com/lwvco/COBALLOTISSUES2005.html
Major Provisions:
¥ Allows the state to keep and use all the tax
revenue it collects for the next five years.
¥ Funds public schools and colleges, roads,
health care, police and firefighter retirement
plans.
¥ Adjusts the budget base yearly for inflation,
and population growth.
¥ Allows for a temporary tax cut when
revenues exceed the existing TABOR limits
after the fifth year.
¥ Sets a new spending level for the state in
2011 and following years to an amount
equal to the highest revenue collected during
the first five years plus inflation and
population growth.

D's provisions:

Major Provisions:
¥ Depends on voter approval of Referendum C
for passage.
¥ Permits the state to borrow up to $2.072
billion with a maximum repayment of
$3.225 billion.
¥ Specifies that the fiscal notes shall be used
for transportation projects, K-12 and higher
education capital construction, and funding
of pensions for police and firefighters.
¥ States that for five years the bonds will be
repaid from revenues that Referendum C
allows the state to retain and spend.
¥ Allows an additional $100 million to be
added to the new state revenue limit to cover
bonding obligations for capital construction,
beginning in the budget year 2010-2011.
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!
Had D passed, the taxpayers would have had to eventually repay the
bonds plus interest. Essentially, D bonds + interest = future taxes.
For the 1st 6 years!


"Referendum D specifically addresses long-
term financial needs such as road and bridge
projects, along with school and higher-
education building construction and
maintenance that are commonly financed
using bonds. "
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!
Evidently you are still in preschool.
Evidently you are a Libertoonian sock puppet!
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Go wash your potty mouth out with soap.
Bite off Gilligan!
Chuck Wright
2005-11-03 04:33:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
Yes on C and no on D equals more taxes and more spending
but no additional debt.
True.
And DEBT is how you finance new road issues!
It's the most common way.
Post by Sam Bam
Now all we have is a REPAIR fund, not a new CONSTRUCTION mandate!
Road repair is one of many things C can fund.
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
Voting down both C and D would have been much better than only
voting down D, and voting down D is much better than passing
both C and D.
By the way, the D bonds were to be underwritten by private bond
companies, but they were to be repaid with tax dollars. The tax
dollars to repay the D bonds could have come from C if C generated
enough revenue to repay the D bonds.
But only for the 1st 6 years!
No. Had D passed, the bonds would have had to have
been repaid by the taxpayers for as long as it takes
to pay them off in full plus interest and regardless
of whether or not C generated enough revenue or not
to repay the D bonds. Also, C is a forever tax
increase because it resets the TABOR spending
baseline.

Here is what the Blue book said about D:

"Repaying the money. The debt will be repaid from state tax
revenue, which includes the additional money the state receives
from Referendum C. Further, if voters approve both Referenda C
and D, the state will be allowed to keep up to an additional
$100 million each year beginning in 2011. Otherwise, this money
will be returned to taxpayers."

Had D passed, the taxpayers would not have been off the hook
after 6 years. Instead D would have allowed the TABOR spending
baseline to be increased by another $100 million beginning in
2011, which would come on top of the baseline increase allowed
by C.
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!
Had D passed, the taxpayers would have had to eventually repay the
bonds plus interest. Essentially, D bonds + interest = future taxes.
For the 1st 6 years!
The bond holders would not have forgiven the debt
after 6 years. The taxpayers would have been on
the hook until the debt plus interest was repaid
in full.
Post by Sam Bam
"Referendum D specifically addresses long-
term financial needs such as road and bridge
projects, along with school and higher-
education building construction and
maintenance that are commonly financed
using bonds. "
Yup. So what?
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!
Evidently you are still in preschool.
Evidently you are a Libertoonian sock puppet!
Your preschooler status is reconfirmed.
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Go wash your potty mouth out with soap.
Bite off Gilligan!
I see you are still having TV sitcom fantasies. I hope the
death of Bob Denver doesn't spoil the fantasy for you.

Chuck Wright
http://www.lpcolorado.org/
Sam Bam
2005-11-03 19:12:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
Yes on C and no on D equals more taxes and more spending
but no additional debt.
True.
And DEBT is how you finance new road issues!
It's the most common way.
Now the Governor will have to intercede.
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Now all we have is a REPAIR fund, not a new CONSTRUCTION mandate!
Road repair is one of many things C can fund.
But not if the asshole Dems get their way!
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
Voting down both C and D would have been much better than only
voting down D, and voting down D is much better than passing
both C and D.
By the way, the D bonds were to be underwritten by private bond
companies, but they were to be repaid with tax dollars. The tax
dollars to repay the D bonds could have come from C if C generated
enough revenue to repay the D bonds.
But only for the 1st 6 years!
No. Had D passed, the bonds would have had to have
been repaid by the taxpayers for as long as it takes
to pay them off in full plus interest and regardless
of whether or not C generated enough revenue or not
to repay the D bonds.
Not regardless, that's inaccurate, C would have paid them off and
allowed any adjustments to complete the process.

Typically these bonds have at the top end 15 year calls.
Post by Chuck Wright
Also, C is a forever tax
increase because it resets the TABOR spending
baseline.
Just as the recession was a "forever" ratchet down because it never
let us recover when revenues rose!
Post by Chuck Wright
"Repaying the money. The debt will be repaid from state tax
revenue, which includes the additional money the state receives
from Referendum C. Further, if voters approve both Referenda C
and D, the state will be allowed to keep up to an additional
$100 million each year beginning in 2011. Otherwise, this money
will be returned to taxpayers."
Now we can look to such niceties as the gas tax increasing or
regisatrtion fees increasing...
Post by Chuck Wright
Had D passed, the taxpayers would not have been off the hook
after 6 years. Instead D would have allowed the TABOR spending
baseline to be increased by another $100 million beginning in
2011, which would come on top of the baseline increase allowed
by C.
Enjoy the potholes and I-25 gridlock Gilligan, you're a classic
libertoonian moron.
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!
Had D passed, the taxpayers would have had to eventually repay the
bonds plus interest. Essentially, D bonds + interest = future taxes.
For the 1st 6 years!
The bond holders would not have forgiven the debt
after 6 years.
Depends on the call date and whether the bonds could have been retired
early.
Post by Chuck Wright
The taxpayers would have been on
the hook until the debt plus interest was repaid
in full.
Unless the bonds had an early call date and could be paid off.
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
"Referendum D specifically addresses long-
term financial needs such as road and bridge
projects, along with school and higher-
education building construction and
maintenance that are commonly financed
using bonds. "
Yup. So what?
You dumb bastard.
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!
Evidently you are still in preschool.
Evidently you are a Libertoonian sock puppet!
Your preschooler status is reconfirmed.
Your functional incongruity with reality is once again exposed.
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Chuck Wright
Post by Sam Bam
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Go wash your potty mouth out with soap.
Bite off Gilligan!
I see you are still having TV sitcom fantasies. I hope the
death of Bob Denver doesn't spoil the fantasy for you.
As long as Dawn Wells is around my fantasies are secure.

Loading Image...

Loading Image...
Ken Smith
2005-11-10 01:38:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!
You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Egad!!! We actually agree!!!
Sam Bam
2005-11-10 19:04:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!
You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Egad!!! We actually agree!!!
Yikes, how'd that happen????

But seriously, you either needed to use your noodle and vote YES on
both or save some $$ and vote NO on both.

Either we need additional infrastructure spending or we don't.

But voting to create the pool for bonds and then failing to engage
them is manifestly brain dead.

Colofornia has spoken, "leave us alone we want to watch the latest
installment of Survivor and then bitch about the potholes..."
Ken Smith
2005-11-10 23:49:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
A yes on C and a NO on D????
You blithering idiots that have infested this state voted to INCREASE
public spending and then turned DOWN *privately funded* road BOND
issuance????
Truly the Californication is complete, the regional IQ has clearly
fallen below room temperature, and the DUMB ASSHOLES who live here
can't tell the difference between what comes out of their pockets in
TAXES and what INDIVIDUALS who purchase bonds can CHOOSE to invest
in!!!
You fucking idiots have at long last shown yourselves to be the
uneducated BOOBS I have always said you are!!!
Congratulations morons, you can't tell a fucking BOND from a TAX!
FUCK each and every one of you!!!!!!!!!!!
Egad!!! We actually agree!!!
Yikes, how'd that happen????
Don't look now, but your neighbor cat wants to shack up with your
dog. ;)
Post by Sam Bam
But seriously, you either needed to use your noodle and vote YES on
both or save some $$ and vote NO on both.
Either we need additional infrastructure spending or we don't.
Can't disagree. This is stark, raving nutz.
Post by Sam Bam
But voting to create the pool for bonds and then failing to engage
them is manifestly brain dead.
Colofornia has spoken, "leave us alone we want to watch the latest
installment of Survivor and then bitch about the potholes..."
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...