Discussion:
=> Ward Churchill wins civil case against CU !! <=
(too old to reply)
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-02 22:26:54 UTC
Permalink
Churchill wins civil case

By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post

Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT


Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Matt
2009-04-03 00:07:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.

Matt
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 02:39:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly in the right here.
Wrong.

He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
Spammy Detector
2009-04-03 12:04:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly in the right here.
Wrong.
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
Little Jeffy 'Spammy' Casto's wall of shame
------------------------------------------------
Post by Howard Johnson
"No, on your knees child - NOW!!!!!!!
You will be my little slut puppy. I will have you
down on your knees, willing to suck cock or a strap on."
FUCK you. FUCK your soul. ... Fuck you and your ratings. Got it?
Good.
Post by Howard Johnson
- Jun 30 2004, 11:51 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU CANUCK BASTARD! ...
- Jun 12 2004, 6:04 pm by King Samuel
FUCK you lying TRAITOR! No reason huh? ... FUCK you
fenris you shitter.
- Jun 4 2004, 10:36 am by King Samuel
Shitzer you pantywaist sack of leftist shit, fuck you to ...
- May 9 2004, 12:04 pm by King Samuel
you, fucking socialist bastard traitor - fuck you to HELL!
- May 26 2004, 11:00 pm by King Samuel
Fuck you to Hell you worthless turd....
- May 10 2004, 5:48 pm by King Samuel
Do you even KNOW what "vitriolic" means? I intended standard
English Your
Post by Howard Johnson
hateful intentions so noted, FUCK you straight to HELL!
- Jun 8 2004, 8:07 pm by King Samuel
. FUCK you to HELL you lying sack of leftist crap.
- Jun 2 2004, 10:18 am by King Samuel
I suppose Reagan would Fuck you, drop dead you worthless
scumsucker.
Post by Howard Johnson
- Jun 12 2004, 6:06 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL BOY!! I PISS ON YOU!
- Jun 3 2004, 10:49 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL KIWI BASTARD!
- Jun 1 2004, 7:10 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL TOO ASSHOLE!
- May 12 2004, 10:10 am by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TRAITOR!
- May 7 2004, 11:32 pm by King Samuel
you schmuck. You asshole! Fuck yourself, twinkie. ...
- May 31 2004, 11:59 am by King Samuel
fuck America, you rotten sons of
bitches! Fuck off, slimeball. Classy bitch....very classy. ...
- May 21 2004, 11:31 pm by King Samuel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt
2009-04-03 14:00:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly in the right here.
Wrong.
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
A traitor? No, that would be an anonymous little coward that thinks he
knows
something about the law.

Matt
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 16:18:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly in the right here.
Wrong.
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
A traitor? No,
YES.
Matt
2009-04-03 18:02:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly in the right here.
Wrong.
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
A traitor? No,
YES.
Grow up, small one. Your diaper is dirty.
Deadrat
2009-04-03 18:36:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado
today as a Denver jury unanimously decided he was fired in
retaliation for his controversial essay on the Sept. 11, 2001
attacks. Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide
whether the former professor can return to his job or receive
front pay for years he may have worked at CU in a separate
hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree..
he was clearly in the right here.
Wrong.
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
A traitor? No,
YES.
YES? Sorry, in this country we don't try people for treason for shooting
their mouths off. It takes some kind of overt action. Like, say, making
war against the country.

Speaking of the country, why do you hate it?
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 18:47:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deadrat
Post by Matt
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado
today as a Denver jury unanimously decided he was fired in
retaliation for his controversial essay on the Sept. 11, 2001
attacks. Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide
whether the former professor can return to his job or receive
front pay for years he may have worked at CU in a separate
hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree..
he was clearly in the right here.
Wrong.
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
A traitor? No,
YES.
YES?
Yes.
Post by Deadrat
Sorry, in this country we don't try people for treason for shooting
their mouths off.
Robert Hansen.
Post by Deadrat
It takes some kind of overt action. Like, say, making
war against the country.
Or giving aid and comfort to its enemies.
Post by Deadrat
Speaking of the country, why do you hate it?
Which country, Fwonce?

I'm ambivalent mostly.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-03 17:46:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
$1000 REWARD for the Verified Whereabouts of Shitbag Sammy.

That gutless unAmerican warmongering traitorous cowardly
piece of shit is long overdue for his righteously deserved Fallujah BBQ.

A Fatwa has been issued for this vile, exterminable child-molesting lowlife.
Spammy Detector
2009-04-04 13:19:30 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:46:27 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
$1000 REWARD for the Verified Whereabouts of Shitbag Sammy.
That gutless unAmerican warmongering traitorous cowardly
piece of shit is long overdue for his righteously deserved Fallujah BBQ.
A Fatwa has been issued for this vile, exterminable child-molesting lowlife.
You haven't been following? He's been outed as Little Jeffy Casto from
Plano, TX. Sanders Kaufman outed him.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-04 18:43:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Spammy Detector
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:46:27 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
$1000 REWARD for the Verified Whereabouts of Shitbag Sammy.
That gutless unAmerican warmongering traitorous cowardly
piece of shit is long overdue for his righteously deserved Fallujah BBQ.
A Fatwa has been issued for this vile, exterminable child-molesting lowlife.
You haven't been following? He's been outed as Little Jeffy Casto from
Plano, TX.
Doubtful.
Post by Spammy Detector
Sanders Kaufman outed him.
When "Sanders" verifies that is in fact shitbag sammy, then he shall receive
the reward.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-04 19:49:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Spammy Detector
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 11:46:27 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
He's a traitor and a liar and an insufferable scumbag, like YOU Mattie.
$1000 REWARD for the Verified Whereabouts of Shitbag Sammy.
That gutless unAmerican warmongering traitorous cowardly
piece of shit is long overdue for his righteously deserved Fallujah BBQ.
A Fatwa has been issued for this vile, exterminable child-molesting lowlife.
You haven't been following? He's been outed as Little Jeffy Casto from
Plano, TX.
Doubtful.
Post by Spammy Detector
Sanders Kaufman outed him.
When "Sanders" verifies that is in fact shitbag sammy, then he shall receive
the reward.
ROTFLMAO!

Right...I'm sure you have an escrow account all set up. Or maybe he'll
get the free IPOD...lol...
krp
2009-04-03 09:27:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.

HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Matt
2009-04-03 14:01:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for. That's the problem. CU
screwed up,
plain and simple.

Matt
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 16:19:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for.
Wrong.

He was found to be a fraud and a plagiarist.

Deal.
Deadrat
2009-04-03 18:38:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the
former professor can return to his job or receive front pay for
years he may have worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree..
he was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for.
Wrong.
He was found to be a fraud and a plagiarist.
Deal.
He is a fraude and a plagiarist. But he was investigated and fired
because he shot his mouth off. His misdeeds were apparently okey-dokey
until he said something the state didn't like. We don't allow the gov to
do that in this country.

Why do you hate our country?
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-03 22:58:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deadrat
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the
former professor can return to his job or receive front pay for
years he may have worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree..
he was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for.
Wrong.
He was found to be a fraud and a plagiarist.
Deal.
He is a fraude and a plagiarist.
And the Jury found the CU regents, Hank Brown and Bill Owens to
be FRAUDS and LIARS who acted UNLAWFULLY.

Typical Repugnikkkan scumbags.
Post by Deadrat
Why do you hate our country?
Because they're gutless cowards.
Deadrat
2009-04-04 00:33:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Deadrat
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
news:f98d6881-4278-4535-ba4e-070bf3b7af73
@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Deadrat
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the
former professor can return to his job or receive front pay for
years he may have worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree..
he was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for.
Wrong.
He was found to be a fraud and a plagiarist.
Deal.
He is a fraude and a plagiarist.
And the Jury found the CU regents, Hank Brown and Bill Owens to
be FRAUDS and LIARS who acted UNLAWFULLY.
Typical Repugnikkkan scumbags.
Post by Deadrat
Why do you hate our country?
Because they're gutless cowards.
I knew there was a reason.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-04 02:36:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Deadrat
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the
former professor can return to his job or receive front pay for
years he may have worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree..
he was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for.
Wrong.
He was found to be a fraud and a plagiarist.
Deal.
He is a fraude and a plagiarist.
And the Jury found the CU regents, Hank Brown and Bill Owens to
be FRAUDS and LIARS who acted UNLAWFULLY.
Nope.

No such material was ruled on.
krp
2009-04-03 16:24:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as
a
Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial
essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for. That's the problem. CU
screwed up, plain and simple.

Matt - don't let me BREAK this NEWS to you - The JURY after listening to
his BULLSHIT - awarded him ONE DOLLAR in Damages!
Matt
2009-04-03 18:03:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as
a
Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial
essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for. That's the problem. CU
screwed up, plain and simple.
    Matt - don't let me BREAK this NEWS to you - The JURY after listening to
his BULLSHIT - awarded him ONE DOLLAR in Damages!
Yes, and? I knew what the damages were. That was never the issue. What
is the
issue is whether CU has to hire him back and pay back salary. You DID
know that
right?

matt
krp
2009-04-03 19:07:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as
a
Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial
essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for. That's the problem. CU
screwed up, plain and simple.
Matt - don't let me BREAK this NEWS to you - The JURY after listening to
his BULLSHIT - awarded him ONE DOLLAR in Damages!
Yes, and? I knew what the damages were. That was never the issue. What is
the
issue is whether CU has to hire him back and pay back salary. You DID
know that right?

THEY DON'T crying towels are on the wall to the left.
Matt
2009-04-03 20:13:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as
a
Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial
essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Because that is not what he was fired for. That's the problem. CU
screwed up, plain and simple.
Matt - don't let me BREAK this NEWS to you - The JURY after listening to
his BULLSHIT - awarded him ONE DOLLAR in Damages!
Yes, and? I knew what the damages were. That was never the issue. What is
the
issue is whether CU has to hire him back and pay back salary. You DID
know that right?
THEY DON'T crying towels are on the wall to the left.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You really need to learn how to grow up. It might help. Then again, it
probably
won't. You are Churchill, if he were an illiterate rightwinger.

Matt
Deadrat
2009-04-03 18:30:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado
today as
a
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controvers
ial
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the
form
er
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he
may h
ave
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic
fraud
?
Because that is not what he was fired for. That's the problem. CU
screwed up,
plain and simple.
Matt
Yep. Here in the US, the gov isn't supposed to retaliate against you for
epeaking. Even if you're wrong; even if you're a fraud; and even if
you're a clown. Especially if you're an unpopular clown.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 16:18:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Precisely.
krp
2009-04-03 16:27:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Precisely.
Our resident asshole claims that he wasn't. Can't help what the POLITICALLY
CORRECT UC argued. He WAS in point of FACT found to have plagiarized much of
his material, and just mad up shit in other parts. What DUMBASS misses, is
that after listening to Churchill's WHINING for 2 weeks, they awarded him
ONE DOLLAR in DAMAGES, Damn they were generous.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-03 18:00:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Precisely.
Our resident asshole claims that he wasn't. Can't help what the POLITICALLY
CORRECT UC argued. He WAS in point of FACT found to have plagiarized much of
his material, and just mad up shit in other parts.
You're lying again Pangborn, you child-molesting pervert.
krp
2009-04-03 19:06:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Precisely.
Our resident asshole claims that he wasn't. Can't help what the
POLITICALLY CORRECT UC argued. He WAS in point of FACT found to have
plagiarized much of his material, and just mad up shit in other parts.
You're lying again Pangborn, you child-molesting pervert.
Sorry that he LIED and you are full of shit and plagiarized in his work
is NOT DEBATABLE.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Churchill_academic_misconduct_investigation

Look you little TWIT read below:

"Federal regulations that define "research misconduct" specify three types
of misconduct: fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. Churchill was
investigated by the University of Colorado's standing Standing Committee on
Research Misconduct, which found that he had falsified and fabricated
information, and plagiarized two different essays."

FOUND THAT HE HAD FALSIFIED AND FABRICATED AND
PLAGIARIZED......................................
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-03 23:07:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Precisely.
Our resident asshole claims that he wasn't. Can't help what the POLITICALLY
CORRECT UC argued. He WAS in point of FACT found to have plagiarized much of
his material, and just mad up shit in other parts.
You're lying again Pangborn, you child-molesting pervert.
Sorry that he LIED and you are full of shit and plagiarized in his work is
NOT DEBATABLE.
You're lying again you shitsucking childmolestor.

100s of Scholars Nationwide say the CU "investigation" was a SHAM !!

"The case against Professor Churchill is flawed on multiple contextual,
procedural, and substantive grounds. . . .

(1) an unreasonably broad and elastic definition of 'research misconduct';

(2) a near-obsessive interest in dissecting a small number of paragraphs and
footnotes from an otherwise 'impressive' and 'unusually
high volume' of academic work . . . and

(3) a failure to fully appreciate the 'scholar activist' and 'public
intellectual' roles. . . that Professor Churchill was clearly expected to fill
when hired by the University of Colorado."

Submitted: Teachers for a Democratic Society petition signed by 494 ( FOUR
HUNDRED NINETY FOUR ) scholars
Howard Johnson
2009-04-04 02:38:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a
Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Precisely.
Our resident asshole claims that he wasn't. Can't help what the POLITICALLY
CORRECT UC argued. He WAS in point of FACT found to have plagiarized much of
his material, and just mad up shit in other parts.
You're lying again Pangborn, you child-molesting pervert.
Sorry that he LIED and you are full of shit and plagiarized in his work is
NOT DEBATABLE.
You're lying again you shitsucking childmolestor.
100s of Scholars Nationwide say the CU "investigation" was a SHAM !!
Fuck em, who cares what whiny little pimple poppers say.
Deadrat
2009-04-03 18:34:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the
former professor can return to his job or receive front pay for
years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Precisely.
Precisely? The gov (in the person of the university) should have
exercised its due diligence and discovered the MASSIVE ACADEMIC FRAUD
when they hired the clown. They didn't. They don't get a do-over
*because* Ward shot his mouth off.

What don't you understand about freedom of speech? Why do you hate our
freedoms?
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-03 17:46:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
krp
2009-04-03 19:02:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question if
for Damages they could award "NONE"?

http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/apr/02/ward-churchill-trial-blog-jury-university-colorado/?partner=yahoo_headlines

http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/apr/02/ward-churchill-university-colorado-trial-reactions/

The jury awarded the former ethnic studies professor, who had tenure, $1 in
damages.

GOT IT JONSEY? ONE DOLLAR! And at that they dramatically OVERPAID the son
of a bitch!
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-03 23:14:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question if for
Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out

Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict Thursday,
and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.

But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis and
Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the $1 award
wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.

She told the lawyers-turned-radio hosts that five of the six jurors were intent
on awarding Churchill money but that one was insistent he get nothing.

Newill said they ultimately agreed on the nominal figure because Churchill's
attorneys didn't provide them with a clear formula for determining damages for
lost income or non-economic losses, like harm to reputation.

"We sat there for pretty much hours debating this," she said.

Silverman asked if Newill thought the jury would have landed on a higher figure
if Lane had called an economist to the stand to quantify Churchill's losses.

"Definitely, I do," she said.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
krp
2009-04-03 23:19:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question
if for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict
Thursday, and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis
and Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the
$1 award wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-03 23:26:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question if
for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict Thursday,
and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis and
Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the $1 award
wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
Wrong again, shitsucker.

There were 6 jurors.

Five wanted to award Dr. Churchill big $$ but since Churchill didn't
ask for $$, nor supply the Jury with any method or formula to calculate
damages, they awarded the $1.

CU is liable to pay the HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of $$ in LEGAL
FEES to David Lane, Dr. Churchill's attorney.

CU is liable to pay for Dr. Churchill's back salary once the Judge makes
his final ruling on reinstatement.

VERDICT:

CU acted UNLAWFULLY.

Dr. Ward Churchill WINS!!

PS: you're still a loser as always, Pangborn.
krp
2009-04-03 23:33:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay the HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of $$ in LEGAL
FEES to David Lane, Dr. Churchill's attorney.
NO JONESY - he got ONE DOLLAR! AND ONLY ONE DOLLAR.
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay for Dr. Churchill's back salary once the Judge makes
his final ruling on reinstatement.
NO he was NOT awarded that.
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU acted UNLAWFULLY.
Dr. Ward Churchill WINS!!
PS: you're still a loser as always, Pangborn.
HE WON - ONE DOLLAR. FAR FAR FAR FAR MORE THAN HE'S WORTH!

But he DID fabricate materials in his ACADEMIC writings. LIED HIS ASS OFF.
Deadrat
2009-04-04 00:37:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay the HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of $$ in LEGAL
FEES to David Lane, Dr. Churchill's attorney.
NO JONESY - he got ONE DOLLAR! AND ONLY ONE DOLLAR.
If you keep this up, PJ is going to continue to make fun of you in ways you
won't be able to comprehend.
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay for Dr. Churchill's back salary once the Judge
makes his final ruling on reinstatement.
NO he was NOT awarded that.
The judge will rule on his reinstatement. He was fired illegally.
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU acted UNLAWFULLY.
Dr. Ward Churchill WINS!!
PS: you're still a loser as always, Pangborn.
HE WON - ONE DOLLAR. FAR FAR FAR FAR MORE THAN HE'S WORTH!
But he DID fabricate materials in his ACADEMIC writings. LIED HIS ASS OFF.
Doesn't matter. He'll get his job back or be compensated for its loss.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-04 18:46:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deadrat
Post by krp
HE WON - ONE DOLLAR. FAR FAR FAR FAR MORE THAN HE'S WORTH!
But he DID fabricate materials in his ACADEMIC writings. LIED HIS ASS OFF.
Doesn't matter. He'll get his job back or be compensated for its loss.
I haven't seen an article that really explained what the case was all
about.
Google is your friend.
Under what conditions is a university allowed to fire a tenured
professor?
It's laid out in the faculty regulations. A *state* univeristy isn't
allowed to retaliate against an employee who exercises free speech.
READ CAREFULLY: Plagerism and LYING are NOT FREE SPPECH.
Yes. They are.
Did the jury actually decide that Churchill wasn't a fraudulent
researcher or were they not asked that question?
They were asked to determine whether the Churchill was fired because of
an article he wrote. They decided he was.
They decided that he was fired because of the political pressure on the
University.
Exactly -- UNLAWFULLY fired.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-04 18:49:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deadrat
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay the HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of $$ in LEGAL
FEES to David Lane, Dr. Churchill's attorney.
NO JONESY - he got ONE DOLLAR! AND ONLY ONE DOLLAR.
If you keep this up, PJ is going to continue to make fun of you in ways you
won't be able to comprehend.
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay for Dr. Churchill's back salary once the Judge
makes his final ruling on reinstatement.
NO he was NOT awarded that.
The judge will rule on his reinstatement. He was fired illegally.
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU acted UNLAWFULLY.
Dr. Ward Churchill WINS!!
PS: you're still a loser as always, Pangborn.
HE WON - ONE DOLLAR. FAR FAR FAR FAR MORE THAN HE'S WORTH!
But he DID fabricate materials in his ACADEMIC writings. LIED HIS ASS OFF.
Doesn't matter. He'll get his job back or be compensated for its loss.
We'll see...
The JURY decided the "COMPENSATION" issue. ONE DOLLAR.
You're lying again you pig-ignorant imbecile.
Churchill's lawyers can file a motion asking the judge to ORDER the University
to rehire him. There is not much chance of that being granted.
There's a 100% chance that the Judge will EITHER force CU to give Dr. Churchill
his tenured $96,000.00 / year teaching position back, or pay Dr. Churchill
$96,000.00 / year
to not teach there.

Either way, Dr. Churchill wins.

You however continue to be the loser you've always been.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-04 20:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
There's a 100% chance that the Judge will EITHER force CU to give Dr. Churchill
his tenured $96,000.00 / year teaching position back, or pay Dr. Churchill
$96,000.00 / year
to not teach there.
There's a 100% certainty you don't understand judicial discretion.

http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/apr/03/ward-churchill-return-university-colorado-boulder/

Martin Katz, an associate professor at the University of Denver's Sturm
College of Law, bets against reinstatement.

The employment and constitutional law expert said it's too likely that
Churchill's presence at CU would cause friction and, due to the history
of bad blood between the former professor and others at the school, lead
to future litigation at every twist and turn.

"As a judge, I would want to know how much Churchill -- if reinstated --
would rub that in the university's face or in the faces of his
colleagues," Katz said. "I wouldn't want to put the employer in an
untenable situation, especially when there's an easy alternative. That
is, give him money."

Katz said judges are typically more willing to award reinstatement at
large workplaces, like CU, where the presence of the wronged employee is
diluted by the vastness of the institution. But he said Churchill, who
attracts plenty of publicity, is a special case.

"If the whole campus is energized around this issue and remains
energized, then the fact that it's a large employer matters less," Katz
said.

Financial compensation awards in "front-pay" scenarios, he said, are
generally capped at two years' worth the dismissed employee's salary,
though it can go as high as five years.

That would mean paying Churchill about $200,000 to $500,000.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-04 18:51:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deadrat
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay the HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of $$ in LEGAL
FEES to David Lane, Dr. Churchill's attorney.
NO JONESY - he got ONE DOLLAR! AND ONLY ONE DOLLAR.
If you keep this up, PJ is going to continue to make fun of you in ways you
won't be able to comprehend.
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay for Dr. Churchill's back salary once the Judge
makes his final ruling on reinstatement.
NO he was NOT awarded that.
The judge will rule on his reinstatement. He was fired illegally.
He can file a MOTION asking for it. It's more likely he'll go snow skiing
on the sun.
Post by Deadrat
Doesn't matter. He'll get his job back or be compensated for its loss.
Listen carefully RODENT- he has gotten ALL the "compensation" he's going to
get. The jury awarded it to him. ONE DOLLAR! As to the Judge giving him his
job back? Do me a favor, PLEASE hold your breath till that happens!!!!!
Were you born stupid, or is it a skill you've practiced to perfection all these
years?

Dr. Churchill will either get his $96,000.00 / year tenured professorship back
OR
will be paid $96,000.00 / year to not teach at CU.

Either way, Dr. Churchill wins.

Lowlife reighwing ignorant shitbags like you lose, as always.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-05 07:53:52 UTC
Permalink
As far as I know, there are no criminal penalties IN ACADEMIA for plagiarism.
http://www.rbs2.com/plag.htm
copyright law
The owner of the copyright (i.e., in most cases, the true author) could sue
the plagiarist in federal court for violation of the copyright.
Yet none -- NOT ONE -- did in the alleged case of Dr. Ward Churchill.

Go figure.

Then go fuck yourself, scumbag.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-05 16:59:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
As far as I know, there are no criminal penalties IN ACADEMIA for plagiarism.
http://www.rbs2.com/plag.htm
copyright law
The owner of the copyright (i.e., in most cases, the true author) could sue
the plagiarist in federal court for violation of the copyright.
Yet none -- NOT ONE -- did in the alleged case of Dr. Ward Churchill.
Go figure.
Not enough in damages to justify the case.
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Then go fuck yourself, scumbag.
Hey Eric, eat some shit.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-05 08:08:17 UTC
Permalink
As far as I know, there are no criminal penalties IN ACADEMIA for
plagiarism.
http://www.rbs2.com/plag.htm
<snipped: miscellaneous info about copyright>
It is possible to run afoul of criminal laws against copyright. But I
suspect (because I don't have enough interest to actually check), that
plagiarising by outright copying would be a civil matter between the
copyright holder and the plagiarist. And make no mistake, there has to be
copying, not just misappropriation of orginal ideas.
Using phrases like "academic misconduct" to describe plagiarism is too
sterile, too kind. Plagiarism is fraud.
Perhaps. If you could show concrete gain to the plagiarist and loss to the
plagiarized. But "academic misconduct" would cover taking credit for the
work of another even in circumstances when no copyright violation would
occur.
statutes about sale of term papers, etc.
The following states have enacted statutes to make unlawful sales of a
term paper, essay, report, thesis, or dissertation to students. I did a
quick search of statutes in the WESTLAW database on 22 Jan 1999 - I
make no representation that this list is either complete or current.
1. California Education Code §§ 66400 - 66405
Interestingly enough, for this section of the code the offending act is a
*sale* Relief is an injunction, so it's not clear to me that this is even
part of the criminal code. Maybe someone can clarify.
2. Colorado § 23-4-101 - 106
3. Connecticut § 53-392a - e
4. Florida § 877.17
5. Illinois ch. 110, § 5/0.01 - 5/1
6. Maine 17-A § 705
7. Massachusetts ch. 271, § 50
8. Nevada 207.320
9. New Jersey 18A:2-3
10. New York Education Law § 213-b
11. North Carolina § 14-118.2
12. Pennsylvania title 18, § 7324
13. Virginia § 18.2-505
14. Washington 28B.10.580 - 584
This may be a distinction without a difference, but the criminal act is not
in the dissemination of the words but in the obtaining of something, say, a
diploma, under false pretenses. In Ward's case, did his alleged plagiarism
deprive the university of anything? They hired him; he did his job.
Presumably the university evaluated his worth periodically and found him
worth his salary.
*** University and other Awards presented to Ward Churchill ***

The Thomas Jefferson Award By the University of Colorado

Herd Award for Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching, University of Colorado
Student Body, 2005.

Gustavus Myers Award for Outstanding Books on Human Rights, 2003 (for On the
Justice of Roosting Chickens), Gustavus Myers Center for Human Rights,
University of Arkansas, 2004.

Martin Luther King Colloquium of Scholars, King Center, Morehouse University,
2004.


Gustavus Myers Award for Outstanding Books on Human Rights, 1996 (for From a
Native Son), Gustavus Myers Center for Human Rights, University of Arkansas,
1997.


Colorado Book Award Finalist in Nonfiction (for Since Predator Came), Colorado
Society for the Book, Denver, 1995.

Gustavus Myers Award for Outstanding Books on Human Rights, 1993 (for Struggle
for the Land), Gustavus Myers Center for Human Rights, University of Arkansas,
1994.


Teaching Excellence Award, Boulder Faculty Assembly, UC Boulder, 1994.


Gustavus Myers Award for Outstanding Books on the Subject of Intolerance in the
United States, 1992 (for Fantasies of the Master Race), Gustavus Myers Center
for Human Rights, University of Arkansas, 1993.


Doctor of Humane Letters, Honoris Causa, Alfred University, 1992.

Excellence in Social Science Writing Award, College of Arts and Sciences, UC
Boulder, 1992.


Thomas Jefferson Award for Outstanding Service and Achievement, UC Boulder,
1990.

Gustavus Myers Award for Outstanding Books on the Subject of Intolerance in the
United States, 1988 (for Agents of Repression), Gustavus Myers Center for Human
Rights, University of Arkansas, 1989.

Annual Umoja Award for Staff Promotion of Cultural Diversity in Higher
Education, Minority Student Coalition, UC Boulder, 1989.

Robert L. Stearns Award, UC Boulder, 1988.

President's University Service Award, UC Boulder, 1987.
In any case, after the university failed to perform
their due diligence in the first place,
And every year thereafter while they bestowed awards, priveleges, tenure
and Departmental Chair upon him ?
they may not proceed to be *shocked* to find malfeasance
after an outcry over Ward's published views.
They may proceed to fuck themselves in the ass like pathetic cowardly
repugnikkkunts, as usual.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-05 08:09:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deadrat
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay the HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of $$ in LEGAL
FEES to David Lane, Dr. Churchill's attorney.
NO JONESY - he got ONE DOLLAR! AND ONLY ONE DOLLAR.
If you keep this up, PJ is going to continue to make fun of you in
ways you won't be able to comprehend.
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU is liable to pay for Dr. Churchill's back salary once the
Judge
Post by Deadrat
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
makes his final ruling on reinstatement.
NO he was NOT awarded that.
The judge will rule on his reinstatement. He was fired illegally.
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
CU acted UNLAWFULLY.
Dr. Ward Churchill WINS!!
PS: you're still a loser as always, Pangborn.
HE WON - ONE DOLLAR. FAR FAR FAR FAR MORE THAN HE'S WORTH!
But he DID fabricate materials in his ACADEMIC writings. LIED HIS ASS OFF.
Doesn't matter. He'll get his job back or be compensated for its loss.
We'll see...
The JURY decided the "COMPENSATION" issue. ONE DOLLAR. Churchill's
lawyers can file a motion asking the judge to ORDER the University to
rehire him. There is not much chance of that being granted.
The jury decided that he'd been fired illegally. Compensation for
this
illegal act is different from ancillary damages, which Ward didn't
even
ask for. I'm not familiar enough with the law involved to say which
remedy the court can provide.
His claim included wages. HE GOT ONE DOLLAR!
Wrong. His claim was that he was illegally fired.
He won.

CU LOST!
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-06 18:47:47 UTC
Permalink
ward is a retard......is he going to move back to his
reservation and be with "his people".......ha!!........
What "Reservation" being an Indian was only ONE of the things he LIED HIS
ASS OFF ABOUT!
Prove it.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-06 19:16:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
ward is a retard......is he going to move back to his
reservation and be with "his people".......ha!!........
What "Reservation" being an Indian was only ONE of the things he LIED HIS
ASS OFF ABOUT!
Prove it.
http://www.pirateballerina.com/blog/entry.php?id=23

Ward Churchill has no Indian ancestors, at least back to the late 1700s
(we have to-date four complete white generations on Churchill's mother's
side (an Indian ancestor beyond that would result in, at best, a 1/32nd
Indian blood quantum), three complete white generations on his father's
side (an Indian ancestor beyond that would result in, at best, a 1/16th
Indian blood quantum).
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-06 21:17:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
ward is a retard......is he going to move back to his
reservation and be with "his people".......ha!!........
What "Reservation" being an Indian was only ONE of the things he LIED HIS
ASS OFF ABOUT!
Prove it.
http://www.pirateballerina.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Bwahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

What next? WorldNUTDaily ??

Got WMD ?

LOL!
Howard Johnson
2009-04-06 21:36:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
ward is a retard......is he going to move back to his
reservation and be with "his people".......ha!!........
What "Reservation" being an Indian was only ONE of the things he LIED HIS
ASS OFF ABOUT!
Prove it.
http://www.pirateballerina.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bwahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
What next?
Can't handle the facts?

http://www.pirateballerina.com/files/churchill-tree.pdf

Too bad:


http://home.comcast.net/~jackott2/ahnentafel2.htm

——————————————————— Source ———————————————————

1 Ward LeRoy CHURCHILL Professor. Born 2 Oct 1947 in
Urbana, Champaign Co., Illinois. Professor of Ethnic Studies at the
University of Colorado



————————————————— Parents ——————————————————

2 Jack L. CHURCHILL. Born 20 Oct 1924 in IL. Died 18 Dec
1989 in Schuyler Co., IL. Race
White. He married Maralyn Lucretia ALLEN.

3 Maralyn Lucretia ALLEN. Born 13 Dec 1926 in Carterville,
Williamson Co., IL. Race White.



———————————————— Grandparents —————————————————

4 Ward(en) LeRoy CHURCHILL. Born Oct 1895 in Spring
Grove, Warren Co., Illinois. Died
? in ?. Race White. He married Ethel M JANES, About 1918.

5 Ethel M JANES. Born 6 Jan 1897 in Illinois. Died 5 Sep
1992 in Rushville, Schuyler Co., IL.
Race White.

_ _ _ _ _ _

6 Philip Henry ALLEN. Born 27 Jul 1902 in Murphysboro,
Jackson Co., IL. Died 22 Aug 1990 in prob. Illinois. Occupation H.S.
Teacher (1930). Race White. He married Minnie B.
BILLINGTON, 30 May 1924 in Metropolis, Massac Co., IL.

7 Minnie B. BILLINGTON. Born 10 Sep 1904 in Brownfield,
Pope Co., IL. Died 11 Oct 1997 in
Rushville, Schuyler Co., IL. Race White.



—————————————— Great-Grandparents ————————————————

8 Albert E. CHURCHILL. Born Feb 1860 in MO. Died 10 Dec
1947 in Monmouth, Warren Co.,
IL. Race White. He married Emma Jane GREEN , 10 Feb 1881 in Mercer
Co., IL.

9 Emma Jane GREEN. Born Apr 1858 in IA. Died 14 Apr 1947
in Monmouth, Warren Co
Illinois. Race White.

(NOTE: The ancestral data for Emma Jane GREEN has been corrected below,
thanks to information provided by Leah Sims.)

(NOTE: In the 1880 Census for Warren Co., IL, Emma is listed as a
servant in the Churchill household.)

_ _ _ _ _ _

10 Henry Elmer JANES. Born Sep 1862 in IL. Died 28 Dec 1943 in
McDonough Co. IL. He
married Carrie L. GORSUCH, 11 Mar 1896 in Schuyler Co., IL
Race White.

(NOTE: More often than not, he went by his middle name Elmer
rather than Henry.)

(SOURCES: 1900 Census for McDonough Co., IL, Illinois
Marriage and Death Record
Indeces Also see additional notes at "Joseph Janes", below.)

11 Carrie L. GORSUCH. Born Apr 1865 in Schuyler Co., IL. Died 31
Jan 1945 in Schuyler Co.,
IL. Race White. (SOURCE: 1900 Census for McDonough Co., IL)

_ _ _ _ _ _

12 Henry Edward ALLEN. Born About 1875 in Jackson Co., IL.
Died 28 Sep 1960 in Illinois. Race White. He married Eliza May
GLOTFELTY, 28 Mar 1901 in Elkville, Jackson Co., IL.

13 Eliza May GLOTFELTY. Born 2 Jan 1875 in Macoupin Co, IL.
Died 9 Jan 1965 in Illinois.
Race White.

_ _ _ _ _ _

14 William Perry BILLINGTON. Born 14 Feb 1864 in Eddyville,
Pope Co., IL. Died 17 Jan 1940 in Jacksonville, Duval Co., FL. He
married Addeen Louella "Addie" BAKER, 20 Oct 1896 in Pope Co., IL. Race
White. (NOTE: 2nd marriage for William)

15 Addeen Louella "Addie" BAKER. Born 6 Sep 1871 in Pope
Co., IL. Died 3 Dec 1938 in Hodgeville, Jacksonville, FL. Race White.



————————————— Great-Great-Grandparents ——————————————

16 Daniel CHURCHILL. Born 24 Jan 1835 in Oneida Co., NY.
Died 12 Dec 1920 in Rock Island
Co., IL. Race White. He married Caroline CONANT, 9 Oct 1856 in Knox Co., IL.

17 Caroline CONANT. Born May 1840 in Chenango Co., NY. Died
13 August 1930 in Rock Island Co., IL. Race White.

(NOTE: It appears that as still a young girl in the early 1850's,
Caroline somehow made her
way west and joined her Conant relatives, Richard and Mary Conant,
in Ohio. She then
joined them in a move farther west to Knox Co., IL, where she met
and married Daniel
Churchill.)

_ _ _ _ _ _

* 18 Caleb J. GREEN, Jr. Born 4 April 1828 in Steuben Co., NY.
Died 20 November 1910, in
Guthrie Co., Iowa . Race White. He married Sarah YOUNG abt. 1848.

* 19 Sarah E. YOUNG. Born 30 April 1831 in New York. Died 24
July 1912 in Guthrie Co. Iowa.
Race White.

(SOURCES: Census records 1850 to 1910, obituary of Emma Green
Churchill, and
Tombstone record of Guthrie Co., IA)
_ _ _ _ _ _

20 Joseph JANES. Born in Tennessee?. Married the widow Mrs.
Mary E. (STOCKTON)
DOWNEN 3 Oct 1861 in McDonough Co., IL. Race: (Undetermined)

21 Mary (nee STOCKTON) DOWNEN or DOWNER. Born 7 October 1833
in McDonough Co., Illinois. Died there on27 November 1891. Race: White.

(NOTE: The 1900 Census for McDonough Co., IL lists Henry and
Carrie JANES living
in Eldorado Township, with son Earl and daughter Edith (both
from Henry’s
1st marriage), and their own daughter, Ethel Janes, age 3. It
also lists,
probably incorrectly, the birth place for Henry’s father and
mother to be
Tennessee and Illinois, respectively. The marriage record for
Henry and
Carrie list Henry's parents as "Joseph JONES" and "Mary
STOCKTON", but
no additional information was given about them in the record
itself. Further
research located a Mary STOCKTON in Eldorado Township in McDonough
Co., IL who married Job DOWNEN/DOWNER there in 1849. In the 1860
census, Mary (STOCKTON) DOWNEN/DOWNER is shown as either widowed
or divorced head of household. Illinois marriage records list a
Mrs. Mary
DOWNER marrying Joseph Janes in October, 1861 (almost one year
before
the birth of Henry Elmer JANES. In the 1870 and 1880 censuses for
Eldorado Township, Mary is still listed under the name "DOWDEN".
Her son
Henry Elbert (JANES), born about 1863, is also shown with a
surname of
"DOWNEN" . He eventually assumed the surname of his father, Joseph
JANES. Other than the two marriage record entries, no
information could be
found regarding Joseph JANES, nor could it be determined why
Mary reverted
to the DOWNEN/DOWNER surname after her marriage to Joseph
JANES apparently ended.

Mary STOCKTON was the daughter of Daniel and
Elizabeth (FRANKLIN)
STOCKTON, early settlers in McDonough Co., IL who originally
came from
Kentucky.)

OBITUARY OF MARY E. DOWNEN
Died--Nov 27, 1891, at her home in Eldorado township, Mary E.
Downen, aged 58 years, 1 month and 20 days. Mary E. Stockton was born at
the home of her parents in Industry township McDonough Co., Ill.,
October 7, 1833. She was married to Job Downen, April 5th 1849. To them
three children were born, Jane, who married Andrew Hills, now deceased,
Ellen, wife of T.B. Pennington, of Macomb, and Rachel, wife of Wm.
Thomas of Macomb. Job Downen died Nov 5, 1855. Mrs. Downen again married
Oct. 3rd, 1861, to Joseph Janes. To them one son was born, Elmer, who
now resides on the old homestead, where she had lived over 36 years.She
professed religion and united with the Baptist church near Industry in
the year 1850. The funeral services were conducted by J.E. Roach at the
church at Pennington's Point, and the remains were interred in the
cemetery at that place. Her mother, father, two sisters, and a brother
have gone on before, leaving Martha Chandler, of Adair, Ill., Julie A.
Beck, of Bozeman, Montana, W.H.Stockton, of Larkin, Kansas,
E.H.Stockton, Industry, Ill., Lcycurgus Stockton, Chicago, Ill., M.A.
Stockton, Champion, Arkansas. Emma Landidge, Ray, Ill., O.E. Stockton,
Ray, Ill., Sarah Stockton, Grandmother, age 83 years Ray, Ill.

_ _ _ _ _ _

22 Nicholas GORSUCH. Born About 1826 in Brooke Co., (West)
Virginia. Died 23 Mar 1892 in Schuyler Co., IL. He married Jane
McNEELEY , 4 Nov 1853 in Alexander Co., IL. Race White.

23 Jane McNEELEY. Born 17 Mar 1834 in St. Johns, New
Brunswick, Canada. Died 21 Apr 1925 in Rushville, Schuyler Co.,IL. Race
White. (Sources: RootsWeb WORLDCONNECT entries of Mary Leitner, and
verified by census data.)

_ _ _ _ _ _

(The following is a corrected entry)

24 Charles H. ALLEN. Born 3 Mar 1843 in Ft. Dix, NJ. Died 14
Jun 1917 in Jackson Co., IL. Race White. He married Mary Mary Nancy
GILSON, 28 Dec 1871 in Danville, Caledonia Co, VT.

25 Mary Nancy GILSON. Born 12 Jul 1840 in Danville, Caledonia
Co., VT. Died 6 Apr 1921 in Jackson Co., IL. Race White.

_ _ _ _ _ _

26 Henry Charles GLOTFELTY. Born Feb 1834 in Elk Lick
Somerset Co.,PA. Died 1908 in Jackson Co., IL. He married Elizabeth E.
NORTH, 19 May 1872 in Williamson Co., IL. Race: White

27 Elizabeth E. NORTH. Born Feb 1851 in Staunton, Macoupin
Co., IL. Race: White

_ _ _ _ _ _

28 Lawson (Lawsen) Messner BILLINGTON. Born 27 Jan 1843 in
Ripley, Lauderdale Co., TN. Died 27 Jul 1919 in Golconda, Pope Co., Ill.
He married Frances E. SMITH, 8 May 1862 in Pope Co., IL. Race: White
(SOURCE: Illinois Death Record Index, in which his given name is listed
as “Loren”)

29 Frances E. SMITH. Born About 1840 in IL. Race - undetermined

(NOTE: In the 1880 Census for Pope Co., IL, Lawson BILLINGTON was no
longer with the
family. Frances ["F.E. Billington"] shown in the census) was
shown as head of the family
and an entry in the “Marital Status column indicated that she had
been deserted.. There was
no entry for Frances to indicate her race (the column was left
blank), although all of the
children were shown as "W" (white). In that same census, under the
column listed "Where
born", Frances's initial entry of "unknown" was clearly overwritten
with "ILL." (Illinois), and
the birthplaces of both of her parents were shown as "unknown". All
of these entries are
unusual, and indicate that Frances was unsure of her origins. The
1850 Census for Scott Co.
lists an 11 year old Frances E. Smith, daughter of John and Pamelia
Smith. It states that
Frances and her mother were born in IL, and John was born in KY.

_ _ _ _ _ _

30 Elbert Caswell BAKER. Born Sep 1823 in Illinois. He
married Elizabeth A. KELLY,
14 Dec 1862 in Pope Co., IL. Race: White.

31 Elizabeth A. KELLY. Born About 1841 in Ohio. Died before
1880. Race: White

(NOTE: Obituary of George L. BAKER, brother of Adeen "Addie"
BAKER:

George L. Baker, son of Casewell Baker and Elizabeth Kelly
Baker, was born Dec. 10, 1868, and died in Missouri Baptist Sanitarium
of St. Louis, Mo., June 15, 1936, aged 57 years, 6 months and 5 days.

He was reared in Pope county and became one of our best
teachers, after graduating at Northern Normal. In his later years he
made his residence in St. Louis. He was for many years a member of the
Masonic Lodge of Pontiac. Because of his sweet personality, education
and friendly manner he had many friends wherever he was.

Those left to mourn his departure are one sister, Mrs. Perry
Billington [Addie Baker], of Homberg; two half-brothers, Willie Baker,
of Homberg, and Ammon Baker, of Metropolis, and a host of other
relatives and friends. One sister and brother preceded him to the great
beyond.

The body was accompanied home by a most devoted and life-long
friend, John C. Rothmeier.

Funeral services were conducted by Rev. W. E. Baker, at
Bethany, June 18th, in the presence of a large concourse of friends. --
copied from the Pope County (IL) Herald-Enterprise.

———————————— Great-Great-Great Grandparents ————————————

32 Benjamin CHURCHILL. Born 3 May 1792 in Newington,
Hartford Co., CT. Died Aug 1893 in Alexis, Mercer Co., IL. Race White.
He married Catherine SLATER.

33 Catherine SLATER. Born 29 Jun 1810 in Schenectady, NY 1.
Died 3 Jan 1880 in Warren Co., IL. Race White.

_ _ _ _ _ _

34 Harrison G. CONANT. Born 1806 in New Hampshire. Died
After 1880 in Brookfield, Eaton Co, MI 3. Race White. He married Janet
"Polly" JOHNSON.

35 Janet "Polly" JOHNSON. Born About 1805 in Chenango Co.,
NY. Died After 1870 in prob. Chenango Co., NY. Race White.

_ _ _ _ _ _

*36 Caleb GREEN, Sr. Born 29 Jan 1789 in Saratoga Co., NY. Died 29
July 1855 in Jefferson Co., WI. Married Catherine CLAUSEN (or Katherine
SHANNON) about 1810 in NY. Race White. (All data unverified)

*37 Catherine CLAUSEN or Katherine SHANNON Born 29 July 1793 in NY.
Died 1882 in ?
(all data unverified)

_ _ _ _ _ _

*38 (To be determined) YOUNG. He married (To be determined).

39 (To be determined).

_ _ _ _ _ _

40 (To be determined) JANES.

41 (To be determined)

_ _ _ _ _ _

42 Daniel STOCKTON. Born 17 Aug 1800 in Barren Co., Kentucky.
Died 28 Jan 1883 in McDonough Co., IL. Race White. He married Elizabeth
FRANKLIN, 27 Nov 1824 in Barren Co., KY.

43 Elizabeth FRANKLIN. Born About 1800 in prob. Kentucky.
Died Oct 1839 in McDonough Co., IL. Race White.

_ _ _ _ _ _

44 (To be determined) GORSUCH.

45 (To be determined).

_ _ _ _ _ _

46 Andrew McNEELEY. Born Dec 1801 in Scotland. Died 7 Jul 1885 in
Schuyler Co., IL. Race White. He married Sarah O'DONALD . (NOTE: Born in
Scotland per 1880 Illinois Census entry for Jane Gorsuch)

47 Sarah O'DONALD. Born Dec 1800 in Ireland. Died 3 Aug 1873
in Schuyler Co., IL. Race White. (NOTE: Born in Ireland per 1880
Illinois census entry for Jane Gorsuch)

(NOTE: Andrew and Sarah initially lived in Ireland after their marriage.
Their first two children were born there. They then moved to New
Brunswick (abt 1830), where three children (including Jane) were born.
They came to the US about 1838, settling first in PA, where two more
children were born. They then came to Shuyler Co., IL after 1843 but
before 1850.

_ _ _ _ _ _

48 (To be determined) ALLEN

49 (To be determined)

_ _ _ _ _ _

50 (To be determined) MARTIN

51 (To be determined)

_ _ _ _ _ _

52 John Phillip GLOTFELTY . Born 22 Jun 1806 in Somerset Co., PA. He
married Eliza DIVELY.
Race: White

53 Eliza DIVELY. Born 1 Aug 1812 in Somerset Co., PA. Race:
White

_ _ _ _ _ _

54 Abraham NORTH. Born About 1795 in England. Died Before
1860 in Williamson Co., IL. He married Ann Eliza (TYNER) RYBURN, 6 Feb
1842 in Williamson Co., IL. Race: White

55 Ann Eliza (TYNER) RYBURN. Born 3 Oct 1815 in Montgomery
Co., TN. Died 30 Nov 1876 in Williamson Co., IL. Race: White

NOTE: Ann Eliza TYNER was first married to James RYBURN in 1832
in Williamson Co., IL

_ _ _ _ _ _

56 (unknown). father of Lawson BILLINGTON.

57 Martha BILLINGTON. Born About 1821 in Bedford Co., TN.
Married Gideon Tucker in Pope Co., IL in 1845. Married Allen GUILLIAMS
(aka WILLIAMS) in Pope Co., IL in 1846.

NOTE: No record could be found to identify the father of Lawson
Billington, son of Martha Billington. In the 1850 and 1860 censuses.
Lawson had assumed the surname Guilliams. After his mother and his
stepfather (Allen Guilliams) separated, he reverted back to his mother’s
maiden name, carrying forward the Billington surname..

_ _ _ _ _ _

60 William BAKER. Born Circa 1791 in NC. He married Margaret BEDLOW.
Race: White.
( NOTE: William left NC for IL about 1818 )

61 Margaret BEDLOW. Race: White

_ _ _ _ _ _

62 (To be determined) KELLY

63 (To be determined)



——————————— Known Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandparents——————————

64 Levi CHURCHILL. Born 28 May 1752, Hartford Co., CT. Died 12
Feb 1836, Newington, CT. He married Ruth Merrills on 12 Jan 1785 in
Hartford, CT.

65. Ruth MERRILLS. Born 9 Dec 1760 Litchfield, CT. Died
after 1807 in Hartford, CT

_ _ _ _ _ _

110 Joshua TYNER. Born 21 Jul 1767 in Wilkes Co., GA. Died 26
Dec 1838 in Franklin/Williamson Co., IL. Buried in Big Muddy River
Indian Style, Franklin/Williamson Co., Il. He married Winifred "Teasby"
TEASLEY, in Wilkes Co., GA. Race: White

NOTES: Research done by many genealogists regarding Joshua TYNER's
ancestry have provided more questions than answers. Most researchers
list Richard and Eliza Jane TYNER as Joshua's parents. Richard TYNER is
thought by most to be descended from English ancestors who lived in Isle
of Wight, Virginia and Chowan Co., North Carolina long before the
Revolutionary War. No surname has been found for Eliza Jane, who Richard
married circa 1762. Some researchers have claimed that while Eliza Jane
was indeed Joshua's mother, his father was a Cherokee chief, but this
cannot be substantiated in any records. One researcher, W. Randy Haynes,
who is also a descendant of Richard TYNER, suggests that Richard himself
may have been part Indian because of his close association with the
Cherokees. Richard Tyner’s Last Will and Testament specifically mentions
Joshua as his son. Other records clearly refer to a raid that took place
in either 1778 or 1779 on the TYNER homestead by either Creek or
Cherokee Indians. The raid took place while Richard TYNER was away from
home fighting in the Revolutionary War. According to this account,
Richard’s wife Eliza Jane and one daughter were murdered by the Indians.
Two other daughters were kidnapped but later recovered. During the raid,
Joshua and his brother Noah hid in trees, avoiding capture. After this
episode, Richard TYNER married Agnes "Snookie" Daugherty, who reputedly
was a Cherokee Indian herself. If this is correct, she would not be in
the direct genealogical line but could have provided Indian influence on
her stepchildren, including Joshua TYNER.

Revolutionary War pension records state that in the 1780’s, Joshua TYNER
volunteered to be an Indian fighter on the western frontier.

Documents show that Joshua left Georgia about 1806, settling first in
Tennessee, then later (about1817) in Illinois where he lived the rest of
his life in what would become Williamson County. Some local stories
there suggest that in his later years, Joshua went to live with the
Indians of the area, and when he died in 1838, he was buried near Big
Muddy Creek "indian-style". The 1830 Census for Franklin Co., IL lists
Joshua and his family as “Free White Persons”, but this does not fully
answer the question as to whether or not Joshua may have had some Indian
lineage.

While research can neither prove nor disprove Joshua TYNER's Indian
bloodline, it is fairly certain that he was at the most 1/2 Indian, not
full-blooded Indian.

MORE NOTES: Another name which has been mentioned regarding Ward
Churchill's ancestry is that of Reuben TYNER. Reuben, according to
several other geneaologists, was born in NC in 1794, and died in 1867 in
Wauhillau, Indian Territory (Oklahoma). He was the son of Dempsey and
Obedience (SEVIER) TYNER. Dempsey TYNER is identified by some of these
genealogists as the brother of Richard TYNER, Joshua's father, which
would have made him Joshua's first cousin if correct. Reuben lived among
the Cherokee Nation in eastern Tennessee, marrying and raising a portion
of his family there. The family then moved to Indian Territory
(Oklahoma), quite possibly as a part of the forced "Trail of Tears"
Cherokee migration. Reuben and his entire family remained there until
their deaths.

111 Winifred "Teasby" TEASLEY. Born 4 Dec 1775 in Bute Co.,
North Carolina. Died 27 Mar 1842 in Williamson Co., IL. Buried in Wilson
Cemetery, Cambria, Williamson Co., Illinois.

(NOTE: About 1805, Joshua and Winifred left NC and settled temporarily
in Montgomery Co., TN. Later, about 1818, they further migrated to
Franklin Co., IL. In 1839, that portion of Franklin Co., IL where the
NORTH and TYNER families resided became a part of Williamson Co.)

---------------

114 Samuel BILLINGTON. Born About 1786 in Johnston Co., NC.
Died 1846 in Ballard Co., KY or Dyer, TN. Race White. He married Tabitha
MOORE, 2 Jan 1810 in Tennessee.

115 Tabitha MOORE. Born 1793 in North Carolina. Died 1865 in
Robertson, TX. Race White.





————————————— Known Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandparents—————————

128. Charles CHURCHILL, Captain. Born 31 Dec. 1723 in
Hartford, CT. Died 29 October
1802 in Hartford, CT. He married Lydia BELDEN 19 Nov
1747 in Hartford, CT.

129. Lydia BELDEN. Born 25 September 1725 in Hartford, CT. Died 19
March 1803 in Hartford,
CT.

(NOTE: Numerous researchers indicate that Lydia BELDEN was the
great-great-great--granddaughter of Capt. Miles Standish and his first
wife Rose of Mayflower and Plymouth Colony fame. Historical documents,
however, consistently state that Miles and Rose had no children. )

-----------

220. Richard TYNER, Sr. Born abt. 1738, probably in
Chowan, NC. Died 24 September 1824
Elbert Co., GA. Married Eliza Jane (Unknown) abt 1761.

221. Eliza Jane (Unknown)

(NOTES: The genealogical information for Richard TYNER is very
sketchy, with many varing opinions among many researchers. In general,
researchers seem to agree that he was a descendant of Nicholas TYNER who
lived first in Isle of Wight, VA, then later in North Carolina. From
there his ancestry becomes unclear and unverifiable, but the names John
HARRIS and Sarah TYNER are frequently mentioned as part of his lineage.
Apparently, there was a Sarah TYNER who was a mistress of John HARRIS,
but there is wide disagreement regarding whether or not Sarah was the
daughter of Nicholas TYNER or a Cherokee woman from a band with which
John HARRIS frequently traded.

Eliza Jane (unknown) was one of two or three wives of Richard
TYNER, and was claimed to be murdered and scalped during an Indian raid
on the TYNER homestead [see story below]. )

----------

228 Ezekial BILLINGTON. Born 22 Mar 1759 in Essex Co., NJ. Died
26 Sep 1848 in Marshall Co., TN. Race White. He married Elizabeth PENNY,
8 Nov 1874 in Johnston Co., NC.

229 Elizabeth PENNY. Born 1760 in Johnston Co., NC. Died
1825 in Bedford Co., TN. Race White.





—————————— Known Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandparents—————————

256 Samuel CHURCHILL. Born 1688, Hartford, CT. Died 21 July 1769,
Hartford, CT. He married
Martha BOARDMAN 26 June 1717 in Hartford, CT

257 Martha BOARDMAN. Born 19 Dec. 1695, Hartford, CT. Died 14
December 1780, Hartford, CT.

_ _ _ _ _ _

258 Josiah BELDING (BELDEN). Born 14 February 1683, Hartford, CT.
Died 5 September 1746,
Hartford, CT. Married Mabel WRIGHT 1 May 1707 in Hartford, CT.

259 Mabel WRIGHT. Born 16 January 1686 in Hartford, CT. Died 11
October 1767 in Hartford, CT

_ _ _ _ _ _

456 James BILLINGTON. Born 1723 in England. Died 1763 in Essex
Co., NJ. Race White. He married Anna America GARNER, 1 May 1742 in Essex
Co., NJ.

457 Anna America GARNER. Born 1723. Died After 1767. Race White.





———————— Known
Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandparents————————

512 Joseph CHURCHILL, Jr.. Born 2 December 1649, Hartford, CT.
Died 1 April 1699,
Hartford, CT. Married Mary CATLIN 13 May 1674 in
Hartford, CT.

513 Mary CATLIN. Born 20 November 1646, Hartford, CT. Died 4 July 1738
in Hartford, CT.

_ _ _ _ _ _

516 John BELDEN, Jr.. Born 12 February 1658 in Hartford, CT. Died 10
January 1714 in Hartford,
CT. Married Dorothy WILLARD 15 June 1682 in Hartford, CT

517 Dorothy WILLARD. Born 1663 in Hartford, CT. Died 28 February 1754
in Hartford, CT.

----------





—————— Known
Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Great-Grandparents———————

1024 Joseph CHURCHILL, Sr. Born 1612 prob. England. Died 1686 in
Hartford, CT. Married
Elizabeth FOOTE in 1638 in Hartford, CT

1025 Elizabeth FOOTE. Born 1616 in Essex, England. Died 1700 in
Hartford, CT

_ _ _ _ _ _

1032 John (BELDING/BAILDON) BELDING. Born 4 Feb 1631 in Staffordshire,
England. Died 1677
in Hartford, CT. Married Lidiah (Lydia) STANDISH in 1657 in
Hartford, CT.

1033 Lidiah (or Lydia) STANDISH. Born 1640 in Hartford, CT. Died
1679 in Hartford, CT.

(NOTE: Researchers are in general agreement that Lydia was the
daughter of Thomas and
Susannah Francis (SMITH) STANDISH. While some of
these researchers also claim
that Thomas was the son of Miles and Rose Standish,
most historical documents do
not support this claim. Plymouth Colony records
indicate that Miles and Rose
STANDISH had no children, and that Rose died in
1623. Thomas was born between
1610 and 1612, eight to ten years before the
Mayflower sailed to America.



****************************************END OF AHNENTAFEL
REPORT*******************************
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-06 21:47:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
ward is a retard......is he going to move back to his
reservation and be with "his people".......ha!!........
What "Reservation" being an Indian was only ONE of the things he LIED
HIS ASS OFF ABOUT!
Prove it.
http://www.pirateballerina.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bwahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
What next?
Can't handle the facts?
http://www.pirateballerina.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Shitbag sammy would know a fact if it was rectally
implanted into his fetid cranium with a cruise missile.

It's Fallujah BBQ time for you, you gutless warmongering
chickenhawk lying cowardly cunt.


=> $1000 Reward for the Verified Whereabouts of Shitbag Sammy <=
Howard Johnson
2009-04-06 23:15:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
ward is a retard......is he going to move back to his
reservation and be with "his people".......ha!!........
What "Reservation" being an Indian was only ONE of the things he LIED
HIS ASS OFF ABOUT!
Prove it.
http://www.pirateballerina.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bwahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
What next?
Can't handle the facts?
http://www.pirateballerina.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Schwing!

Nailed ya again!
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Shitbag sammy would know a fact if it was rectally
implanted into his fetid cranium with a cruise missile.
It's Fallujah BBQ time for you, you gutless warmongering
chickenhawk lying cowardly cunt.
=> $1000 Reward for the Verified Whereabouts of Shitbag Sammy <=
Don't forget the free IPOD...
Howard Johnson
2009-04-08 18:38:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
ward is a retard......is he going to move back to his
reservation and be with "his people".......ha!!........
What "Reservation" being an Indian was only ONE of the things he LIED
HIS ASS OFF ABOUT!
Prove it.
http://www.pirateballerina.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Bwahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
What next?
Can't handle the facts?
http://www.pirateballerina.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Shitbag sammy would know a fact if it was rectally
implanted into his fetid cranium with a cruise missile.
It's Fallujah BBQ time for you, you gutless warmongering
chickenhawk lying cowardly cunt.
=> $1000 Reward for the Verified Whereabouts of Shitbag Sammy <=
You forgot to mention the free IPOD, eric.

Howard Johnson
2009-04-04 02:41:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a
Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question if
for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict Thursday,
and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis and
Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the $1 award
wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
Wrong again, shitsucker.
There were 6 jurors.
Five wanted to award Dr. Churchill big $$ but since Churchill didn't
ask for $$, nor supply the Jury with any method or formula to calculate
damages, they awarded the $1.
CU is liable
Blah, blah, blah...
s***@yahoo.com
2009-04-04 02:44:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today
as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question
if for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict
Thursday, and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis
and Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the
$1 award wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
Damn dude, you right wing trash sure want to argue but sure cannot
'bother yourselves' to actually think.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-04 02:43:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@yahoo.com
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today
as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question
if for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict
Thursday, and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis
and Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the
$1 award wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
Damn dude, you right wing trash
Damn traitor, you left wing vermin.
krp
2009-04-04 10:54:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@yahoo.com
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today
as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he
may
have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question
if for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict
Thursday, and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis
and Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the
$1 award wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
Damn dude, you right wing trash sure want to argue but sure cannot
'bother yourselves' to actually think.
Did you MISS that other Juror(S) said they wanted to award him NOTHING????
They were told that IF they didn't award him anything, then how much $$$$$$$
would be up to the judge. So the judged ALL the merits to Churchill's claims
and Awarded him ONE DOLLAR.
Deadrat
2009-04-04 18:00:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
..
Post by s***@yahoo.com
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
s.com... On Apr 2, 4:26 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today
as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years
he may
have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I
disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the
person suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question
if for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the
verdict Thursday, and were escorted from the courthouse by
sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis
and Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the
$1 award wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
Damn dude, you right wing trash sure want to argue but sure cannot
'bother yourselves' to actually think.
Did you MISS that other Juror(S) said they wanted to award him
NOTHING???? They were told that IF they didn't award him anything,
then how much $$$$$$$ would be up to the judge. So the judged ALL the
merits to Churchill's claims and Awarded him ONE DOLLAR.
Again, there were two issues: was Ward illegally deprived of his job and
did Ward suffer damages (e.g., emotional distress) from the deprivation.
Ward didn't present any witnesses to say that he had been damaged beyond
the firing or to say how a juror might calculate those damages. So he
didn't get any. This is a different question from being made whole for
the illegal act of firing him.

What's so hard about this?

The judge may order his reinstatement; the judge may order that the
University pay him his salary in lieu. I suspect it will be one of the
two.

Perhaps the judge will throw up his hands and decide that he's unable
fashion a remedy. We'll see.
_ Prof. Jonez _
2009-04-04 18:55:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by s***@yahoo.com
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today
as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his
controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question
if for Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict
Thursday, and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis
and Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the
$1 award wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
ONE JUROR OF 12.
Damn dude, you right wing trash sure want to argue but sure cannot
'bother yourselves' to actually think.
Did you MISS that other Juror(S) said they wanted to award him NOTHING????
You really are dumber than a bucket of dirt, aren't you Ken?

There were 6 jurors.

Five wanted to award Dr. Churchill big $$ but since Churchill didn't
ask for $$, nor supply the Jury with any method or formula to calculate
damages, they awarded the $1.
Post by krp
They were told that IF they didn't award him anything, then how much $$$$$$$
would be up to the judge.
More complete bullshit from the shiteating bullshitter.
Post by krp
So the judged ALL the merits to Churchill's claims and Awarded him ONE DOLLAR.
In damages.

CU will now be forced to pay HUNDRED of THOUSANDS of $$ to David Lane for
his legal fees prosecuting the case.

CU will now be forced to pay Dr. Ward Churchill $96,000.00 / year whether he
teaches
there or not.
Howard Johnson
2009-04-04 02:40:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question if for
Damages they could award "NONE"?
Juror speaks out
Members of the jury declined to talk to reporters after the verdict Thursday,
and were escorted from the courthouse by sheriff's deputies.
But a woman identifying herself as juror Bethany Newill called the Caplis and
Silverman show on Denver's KHOW radio Thursday evening, and said the $1 award
wasn't intended to send a message that Churchill was a fraud.
She told the lawyers-turned-radio hosts that five of the six jurors were intent
on awarding Churchill money but that one was insistent he get nothing.
Newill said they ultimately agreed on the nominal figure because Churchill's
attorneys didn't provide them with a clear formula for determining damages for
lost income or non-economic losses, like harm to reputation.
"We sat there for pretty much hours debating this," she said.
Silverman asked if Newill thought the jury would have landed on a higher figure
if Lane had called an economist to the stand to quantify Churchill's losses.
"Definitely, I do," she said.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Where'd you plagiarize this from without attribution?

I already know, but you need to answer.
s***@yahoo.com
2009-04-04 02:22:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question if
for Damages they could award "NONE"?
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/apr/02/ward-churchill-trial-blog-jury-university-colorado/?partner=yahoo_headlines
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/apr/02/ward-churchill-university-colorado-trial-reactions/
The jury awarded the former ethnic studies professor, who had tenure, $1 in
damages.
GOT IT JONSEY? ONE DOLLAR! And at that they dramatically OVERPAID the son
of a bitch!
That's all they asked for you pathetic clueless fucks.
krp
2009-04-04 10:51:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@yahoo.com
Post by krp
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by Matt
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today
as
a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
HOW can he be "in the right" when he was guilty of MASSIVE academic fraud?
Prove it, scumbag.
Christ you can be IGNORANT.. The jury foreman gave the judge a question if
for Damages they could award "NONE"?
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/apr/02/ward-churchill-trial-blog-jury-university-colorado/?partner=yahoo_headlines
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/apr/02/ward-churchill-university-colorado-trial-reactions/
The jury awarded the former ethnic studies professor, who had tenure, $1 in
damages.
GOT IT JONSEY? ONE DOLLAR! And at that they dramatically OVERPAID the son
of a bitch!
That's all they asked for you pathetic clueless fucks.
WRONG!
Naughtius
2009-04-03 00:50:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Hear! Hear!... GOOD Show!

First Amendment 2, Now This...

Colorado May YET Redeem Itself and become a Place Worthy of Living
In...

Naughtius "This Upside Down Groucho On A Trapeze KILLS Fascists"
Maximus
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 02:38:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Naughtius
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Hear! Hear!... GOOD Show!
Fuck off, bobandcarole pedophiles!

IP address : 70.215.87.107
IP address latitude: 38.000000
IP address longitude: -97.000000
Naughtius
2009-04-03 04:37:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
   Hear! Hear!... GOOD Show!
Fuck off, bobandcarole pedophiles!
AS IN me an' Ward FUCK YOU In The Ass Until yer CHOKIN' on The Cum
Bleedin' Out Yer Nose?

Sounds FUN, BUT Neither One of us is Inclined to Stand In Line
anymore...
Post by Howard Johnson
IP address :     70.215.87.107
IP address latitude:    38.000000
IP address longitude:   -97.000000
??? AS IN "38 NORTH & 97 WEST"??

OOOOOOOOOOHHHHHH, Dat FUNKY WHAHYT Boy... SHEEEEEEE-Iiiiit!!!
Why... He Be Mos' Jis Aroun' De Cohnur!!!

He gohna Be LOOK raht attus an' be WHOOPin' us... Dat 38 an' 97
Truck...

Less we Be FUCKin' `im In De Ass Foiss...

Naughtius "Just So Long As THIS BITCH Doesn't Live In... Ummmm...
*HERE*" Maximus
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 16:17:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Naughtius
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Hear! Hear!... GOOD Show!
Fuck off, bobandcarole pedophiles!
AS IN
I wonder what your neighbors will say when they realize what you do here?
Spammy Detector
2009-04-03 12:04:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Naughtius
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a Denver
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversial essay
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may have
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Hear! Hear!... GOOD Show!
Fuck off, bobandcarole pedophiles!
IP address : 70.215.87.107
IP address latitude: 38.000000
IP address longitude: -97.000000
Little Jeffy 'Spammy' Casto's wall of shame
------------------------------------------------
Post by Howard Johnson
"No, on your knees child - NOW!!!!!!!
You will be my little slut puppy. I will have you
down on your knees, willing to suck cock or a strap on."
FUCK you. FUCK your soul. ... Fuck you and your ratings. Got it?
Good.
Post by Howard Johnson
- Jun 30 2004, 11:51 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU CANUCK BASTARD! ...
- Jun 12 2004, 6:04 pm by King Samuel
FUCK you lying TRAITOR! No reason huh? ... FUCK you
fenris you shitter.
- Jun 4 2004, 10:36 am by King Samuel
Shitzer you pantywaist sack of leftist shit, fuck you to ...
- May 9 2004, 12:04 pm by King Samuel
you, fucking socialist bastard traitor - fuck you to HELL!
- May 26 2004, 11:00 pm by King Samuel
Fuck you to Hell you worthless turd....
- May 10 2004, 5:48 pm by King Samuel
Do you even KNOW what "vitriolic" means? I intended standard
English Your
Post by Howard Johnson
hateful intentions so noted, FUCK you straight to HELL!
- Jun 8 2004, 8:07 pm by King Samuel
. FUCK you to HELL you lying sack of leftist crap.
- Jun 2 2004, 10:18 am by King Samuel
I suppose Reagan would Fuck you, drop dead you worthless
scumsucker.
Post by Howard Johnson
- Jun 12 2004, 6:06 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL BOY!! I PISS ON YOU!
- Jun 3 2004, 10:49 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL KIWI BASTARD!
- Jun 1 2004, 7:10 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL TOO ASSHOLE!
- May 12 2004, 10:10 am by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TRAITOR!
- May 7 2004, 11:32 pm by King Samuel
you schmuck. You asshole! Fuck yourself, twinkie. ...
- May 31 2004, 11:59 am by King Samuel
fuck America, you rotten sons of
bitches! Fuck off, slimeball. Classy bitch....very classy. ...
- May 21 2004, 11:31 pm by King Samuel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Abbie Hoffman
2009-04-03 02:09:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a=
Denver
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversia=
l essay
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may hav=
e
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
Matt
There's man's evil law, then there's God's Perfect Law. And never the twain
shall meet.

But even if Churchill is something of a plagiarizer and a fake indian, he was
nail on the fucking head with the Ersatz zionists' false flag "9/11," and the
thieving lying greedy self serving back stabbing murdering "little Eichmanns"
that got what they deserved in the WTC demolition, and the little "slap on the
wrist" that hit arrogant genocidal warmongering ZOG Pentagon on the same day.

I hope that Churchill gets reinsated at CU. I wish that all professors were
as brave and outspoken as Churchill is against the District of Criminals--the
biblical "mystery babylon" of the end times. Lucky for us "goys," the filthy
Godless heathen JUWESA is headed for the bottom of the sea. Breaking apart "by
2010," just as the Russians predicted. Ersatz israel hasn't got a friend in
the world. I look for a giant mushroom cloud over Tel Aviv any day now.





The Juwes are
the men that
Will not
be Blamed
for nothing
-W.W. Gull
Howard Johnson
2009-04-03 02:37:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Abbie Hoffman
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a=
Denver
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversia=
l essay
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may hav=
e
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
Matt
There's man's evil law, then there's God's Perfect Law. And never the twain
shall meet.
But even if Churchill is something of a plagiarizer and a fake indian, he was
nail on the fucking head with the Ersatz zionists' false flag "9/11," and the
thieving lying greedy self serving back stabbing murdering "little Eichmanns"
Fuck off and DIE you insipid vermin.
Spammy Detector
2009-04-03 12:03:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Howard Johnson
Post by Abbie Hoffman
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
Churchill wins civil case
By Felisa Cardona The Denver Post
Posted: 04/02/2009 11:24:46 AM MDT
Ward Churchill won his case against the University of Colorado today as a=
Denver
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
jury unanimously decided he was fired in retaliation for his controversia=
l essay
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
on the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
Denver Chief District Judge Larry J. Naves will decide whether the former
professor can return to his job or receive front pay for years he may hav=
e
Post by _ Prof. Jonez _
worked at CU in a separate hearing.
Agree or disagree with Churchill's philosophies.. and I disagree.. he
was clearly
in the right here. The law is the law, whether you like the person
suing or not.
Matt
There's man's evil law, then there's God's Perfect Law. And never the twain
shall meet.
But even if Churchill is something of a plagiarizer and a fake indian, he was
nail on the fucking head with the Ersatz zionists' false flag "9/11," and the
thieving lying greedy self serving back stabbing murdering "little Eichmanns"
Fuck off and DIE you insipid vermin.
Little Jeffy 'Spammy' Casto's wall of shame
------------------------------------------------
Post by Howard Johnson
"No, on your knees child - NOW!!!!!!!
You will be my little slut puppy. I will have you
down on your knees, willing to suck cock or a strap on."
FUCK you. FUCK your soul. ... Fuck you and your ratings. Got it?
Good.
Post by Howard Johnson
- Jun 30 2004, 11:51 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU CANUCK BASTARD! ...
- Jun 12 2004, 6:04 pm by King Samuel
FUCK you lying TRAITOR! No reason huh? ... FUCK you
fenris you shitter.
- Jun 4 2004, 10:36 am by King Samuel
Shitzer you pantywaist sack of leftist shit, fuck you to ...
- May 9 2004, 12:04 pm by King Samuel
you, fucking socialist bastard traitor - fuck you to HELL!
- May 26 2004, 11:00 pm by King Samuel
Fuck you to Hell you worthless turd....
- May 10 2004, 5:48 pm by King Samuel
Do you even KNOW what "vitriolic" means? I intended standard
English Your
Post by Howard Johnson
hateful intentions so noted, FUCK you straight to HELL!
- Jun 8 2004, 8:07 pm by King Samuel
. FUCK you to HELL you lying sack of leftist crap.
- Jun 2 2004, 10:18 am by King Samuel
I suppose Reagan would Fuck you, drop dead you worthless
scumsucker.
Post by Howard Johnson
- Jun 12 2004, 6:06 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL BOY!! I PISS ON YOU!
- Jun 3 2004, 10:49 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL KIWI BASTARD!
- Jun 1 2004, 7:10 pm by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TO HELL TOO ASSHOLE!
- May 12 2004, 10:10 am by King Samuel
FUCK YOU TRAITOR!
- May 7 2004, 11:32 pm by King Samuel
you schmuck. You asshole! Fuck yourself, twinkie. ...
- May 31 2004, 11:59 am by King Samuel
fuck America, you rotten sons of
bitches! Fuck off, slimeball. Classy bitch....very classy. ...
- May 21 2004, 11:31 pm by King Samuel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading...