Discussion:
Wardo Kawliga preaches violence (indirectly)
(too old to reply)
Sam Bam
2005-02-26 23:00:40 UTC
Permalink
http://www.alternativetentacles.com/octopodes/323/***@v4xIxKRwLVB/Ward_Churchill-What_Can_Be_Done.mp3


"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of law or
be abolished. I favor the latter myself, but as to exactly how ya can do
it, well again I say you look like a bright, intelligent, imaginative
individual, I bet there's a police station down the street and you could
figure out how to extract a penalty from that. But I'm not gonna tell ya
how, right? <chuckles>"
Ken Smith
2005-02-27 01:34:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of law or
be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching public
officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred. If we did it
the old-fashoined way, perhaps we wouldn't have so much corruption. :)
Sam Bam
2005-02-27 05:40:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of law
or be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching public
officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred.
Oh my.

That's a telling breach of juris prudence.

Well, I'd recommend viewing The Ox Bow Incident" - but perhaps I'm far
too late in your developmental process to remediate common sense.
Post by Ken Smith
If we did it
the old-fashoined way, perhaps we wouldn't have so much corruption. :)
Ever wonder why no one takes you seriously?
Ken Smith
2005-02-28 01:00:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of law
or be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching public
officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred.
Oh my.
That's a telling breach of juris prudence.
Tell that to our Founding Fathers ... who didn't just talk about it.
Sam Bam
2005-02-28 01:04:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of law
or be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching public
officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred.
Oh my.
That's a telling breach of juris prudence.
Tell that to our Founding Fathers ... who didn't just talk about it.
Cite?
Ken Smith
2005-02-28 02:48:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of
law or be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching
public officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred.
Oh my.
That's a telling breach of juris prudence.
Tell that to our Founding Fathers ... who didn't just talk about it.
Cite?
The American Revolution.
Sam Bam
2005-02-28 05:51:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of
law or be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching
public officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred.
Oh my.
That's a telling breach of juris prudence.
Tell that to our Founding Fathers ... who didn't just talk about it.
Cite?
The American Revolution.
Oh come on - something relevant, we're in no danger of a royalist requiem.
Ken Smith
2005-02-28 14:25:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means are
available and necessary, the government to adhere to the rule of
law or be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching
public officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred.
Oh my.
That's a telling breach of juris prudence.
Tell that to our Founding Fathers ... who didn't just talk about it.
Cite?
The American Revolution.
Oh come on - something relevant, we're in no danger of a royalist requiem.
With King George II and his corrupt courtiers at the helm?

As for me, I'd be satisfied if King George II is delivered to the
dock in the Hague.
Sam Bam
2005-02-28 17:46:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
Post by Ken Smith
Post by Sam Bam
"It's in their own self interest to compel, by whatever means
are available and necessary, the government to adhere to the
rule of law or be abolished.
What's wrong with this statement, Sam? I'm all for lynching
public officials who break the law. Four-Jeep method preferred.
Oh my.
That's a telling breach of juris prudence.
Tell that to our Founding Fathers ... who didn't just talk about it.
Cite?
The American Revolution.
Oh come on - something relevant, we're in no danger of a royalist requiem.
With King George
There is no King.

Grow up.

Loading...